Payment rights may be invoked for materials delivered to the site but not yet included in the commissioned work, as well as for temporary work, facilities or materials that are not yet on site. NZS3910:2013 establishes a new procedure within a specified time frame that coordinates the engineer and contractor who agrees on an interim payment plan before a payment request is formalized. The contract has been moved to the front of the contract, so it is no longer hidden on the back of the second calendar. Additional schedules have been added to incorporate already widely circulated documents, including: NZS3910:2013 now requires a contractor to provide a simple program that shows how it proposes to meet the completion date. Special conditions may also be imposed on the contractor`s submission of a “comprehensive program” containing details such as work sequencing; A critical analysis of trajectories indicating activity times and dependencies; Key data on access to the site Providing essential equipment and services (customers); and work on separation contracts. We`ve described some of the most important changes in NZS3910:2013 that current users need to understand. The additional schedules and provisions are substantial changes and all contractors should review their written contracts in light of these contracts, perhaps to include the most relevant contracts. The information in this article is designed only as a general guide and is not designed as legal advice. Detailed legal advice should be sought to cover a particular situation. Specific provisions for fee reimbursement contracts have been added, including: in this article, we describe some of the most important changes introduced by NZS3910:2013 that must respect current users. The amendments provide contractors with the opportunity to review the cheapest for their needs and examine the adequacy of NZS3910:2013 for those currently using another form of construction contract. . Although NZS3910 is described as “limited technical control,” this situation has changed considerably.
In summary, the main changes are: the guidelines have also been rewritten and no longer have contractual status. If any of these events occur, it is necessary for the contractor or engineer to meet with each other to discuss proposals regarding the effects of the notified event. The introduction of these new commitments is welcomed as it will help promote clear communication between the parties. This followed a review focused primarily on feedback from the construction industry, which registered 1,000 submissions over a two-year period. The revision resulted in a new standard form of the contract, much wider and more user-friendly and downloadable from the New Zealand Standards website. In our article last November, we marked the proposed amendments to the 2004 Construction Act, one of which will make written contracts mandatory for certain types of construction. There will also be new requirements that will have to be included in such contracts. While NZS3910 may not be the contract of choice for your average residential project, it is suitable for longer or more complex projects and the new NZS3910:2013 has added components that deserve consideration. NZS3910:2013 imposes specific safety, quality and management requirements. Previously, these had been left to the client (order giver) or engineer in order to document elsewhere in the contract that the contractor must make available under these plans.